|
Harpers
18 Nov 2005
By David Williams
The Interview:
Giles Cook MW
Wine Development Director, Alliance Wine
What
got you into wine?
The usual
cliché I say is that I did a history degree, so the
only things I was qualified to do were eating and drinking;
three hours of tutorials a week left a lot of time for other
stuff. Me and a mate did the restaurant reviews for a newspaper,
which was a bit of a farce really. We'd go along and ask for
free food beforehand, so they knew we were coming. But my
parents had always had an interest in wine, and my mum was
PA to Ronald Avery for a couple of years when she started
out, so she always says there's a link.
But
your first job, like many in the trade, was at Majestic. How
was that?
When
I started out in 1992 the pay was, shall we say, challenging
to live on in London. But I thoroughly enjoyed working there.
It was a great grounding in the less glamorous parts of the
trade - lugging 20 cases of water up five flights isn't everyone's
idea of fun - and also in things like team motivation and
tasting - they let their staff taste a lot of wine. If I'm
suggesting to people about how to get on in the wine trade,
I'd always say they should work at Majestic or Oddbins. You
meet so many good people. If nothing else, if you've worked
at Majestic or Oddbins you have an ice-breaker at a meeting
to reminisce about the days when you were running around in
your Citroën van lugging water about.
So
how did you wind up in Scotland?
I did
most of my schooling in Edinburgh, and my ex-brother-in-law
was working for Alliance, so when an opportunity came up to
work for them, it felt right. It was a fairly strong company
in Scotland at the time, but not so strong elsewhere. I started
up by trying to expand their sales territories further south.
Is
there much of a difference between the Scottish and the London
wine scenes?
Glasgow
and Edinburgh both have very strong eating and drinking cultures,
and Edinburgh in particular has always had a very strong wine
culture. Also a lot of the strong players from England now
have reps in Scotland, so the competitive set isn't all that
different. The one dramatic difference is size. London has
a lot more high-end places and something like 40% of the overall
spend in the UK on-trade! So we're putting a lot of emphasis
on growing our presence there.
As
a company, Alliance has changed a lot during your time there.
In the
past four years it's really exploded. We've made a huge effort
to increase the quality and profile of the portfolio. We've
got a large range and, because we're on-trade-led, we have
to have a lot of service products: you've got to have all
the Muscadets, Sancerres and Pouilly-Fumés. What I've
tried to do is go back and root out anything that was mediocre
and build an identity for Alliance.
That
identity is increasingly Australian. Why is that?
I decided,
maybe out of selfishness or self-interest at first, that I'd
like to do quite a lot in Australia. We've taken on a lot
of new producers and developed their market profile, people
such as Stella Bella, Two Hands and Domaine A. And that's
given something for people to hang on to. We've got a massive
presence at the Australia Day tastings now.
You're
also quite big on Australian regionality. Is the UK ready
for that?
For most
of the larger producers - for whom Australian wine is, to
all intents and purposes, a commodity brokered by multiple
retailers - there's not really much reason for them to make
regionality a serious proposition to the consumer. But to
make Australia interesting for the consumer in a more long-term
way, there's got to be more to Australia than 'Brand Australia'.
And there are big regional differences. Take Domaine A and
Two Hands, for example: in a blind tasting you wouldn't guess
that they were even from the same country. In any case, I
don't want to have to work with the same products day in,
day out. It's got to be interesting and exciting, and though
you have to make money, too, most of us in the trade are in
it for the interest above all.
Regionality
is all about getting consumers to trade up. Are consumers
more prepared to spend on wine?
If there
was one thing in the wine trade that I would change, it would
be to make it easier to trade up. We've got such a bee in
our bonnet in this country about the price of wine - and an
irrationally low average spend. How did the wine trade get
in the position where, at our key time of year, we're discounting?
Why does everything have to be price-pointed so closely? I'm
not naive about it - I understand that the multiples use wine
almost as a loss leader - but I wish there was more of a collective
effort in the wine trade to avoid it. There are very few companies
in the wine trade that haven't had their margins eroded to
a greater or lesser degree in the past few years. But that
can't continue.
In his
11 years with Alliance, Giles Cooke MW has gone from on-trade
sales to wine development director. The company has taken
similarly big strides. It used to sell a 100% French list
almost exclusively in the Scottish on-trade. Now it has specialisms
in Australia (with the likes of Majella, Stella Bella, Two
Hands and Domaine A), New Zealand (Sherwood Estate) and Spain
(Luis Cañas), as well as France (Domaine Brusset in
the Rhône; Domaine Crochet in Sancerre), and it sells
to the on- and off-trade all over the country. The company
was started by MD Christian Bouteiller and chairman Jonathan
Kennett in 1984.
View
this article on the Harpers website at:
http://www.harperswinespirit.com/2683
|